Which ELDs Were Affected?

The two devices taken off the approved list are:

• Walker ELD – Model WAL-R, ELD Identifier WLK790
• SR ELD – Model SR-E, ELD Identifier SRE288

Both were removed for failing to meet the technical requirements FMCSA sets for electronic logging devices.

What Drivers Are Required to Do

If you’ve been using either system, you’ll need to stop immediately and begin logging hours using paper logs or compliant logging software while you transition to a new device. FMCSA is giving drivers and carriers until September 29, 2025, to switch over to a registered ELD.

If you continue using one of the revoked devices past that date, you’ll be considered out of compliance. That includes potential citations for not maintaining a valid record of duty status and the risk of being placed out of service under CVSA guidelines.

What If the Device Companies Fix the Issues?

According to FMCSA:

“If the ELD providers correct all identified deficiencies for their device, FMCSA will place the ELD back on the Registered Devices list and inform the industry and the field of the update,” FMCSA said. “However, FMCSA strongly encourages motor carriers to take the actions listed above now to avoid compliance issues in the event that these deficiencies are not addressed by the ELD provider.”

In other words, don’t wait for a fix that might not happen. If you’re running with one of these devices, start the switch now to avoid downtime or violations later.

Why It Matters

This move follows the earlier removal of multiple ELDs earlier this year. With FMCSA continuing to crack down on non-compliant technology, drivers and fleet managers must stay updated. Checking your ELD’s registration status regularly can help avoid major disruptions and keep you compliant on the road.

Source: The Trucker

The post Walker and SR ELDs Removed from FMCSA’s Approved List—Here’s What Drivers Need to Do appeared first on Truck Drivers USA.

Why Were These ELDs Revoked?

According to the FMCSA, these devices failed to meet the minimum requirements outlined in their functional specification regulations. Gorilla Fleet Safety later confirmed they had self-revoked the registrations for all eight devices in December, citing that the devices were unsupported legacy applications.

Here’s the list of revoked devices, effective May 12:

• AllwaysTrack
• Command Alkon Trackit
• ELDX
• Gorilla Safety Compact ELD
• HCSS ELD
• LB Technologies FleetTrack HOS
• Simplex ELD 2GO
• Trucker Path ELD Pro

Next Steps for Carriers and Drivers

Drivers and carriers currently using any of these devices must replace them with compliant ELDs by July 11, 2025. Until then, FMCSA has provided the following guidance:

• Revert to paper logs or logging software to maintain accurate hours-of-service (HOS) records while making the transition.
• Inspectors are advised not to issue violations for “No record of duty status” or “Failing to use a registered ELD” before the replacement deadline. Instead, they may review paper logs, logging software, or data from the revoked ELD as backup documentation.

Consequences After July 11

After July 11, drivers and carriers who continue to use these revoked devices will face significant penalties:

• They will be considered as operating without an ELD, in violation of FMCSA guidelines (395.8(a)(1)).
• This can lead to out-of-service (OOS) orders as dictated by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) criteria.

Will the Revoked Devices Return?

The FMCSA noted that the devices could be reinstated on its registered list if Gorilla Fleet Safety resolves the issues. However, the company’s statement regarding self-revocation indicates that updates are unlikely.

To remain compliant and avoid disruptions, motor carriers should act swiftly to transition to FMCSA-approved devices.

Source: Overdrive

The post FMCSA Revokes Eight Gorilla Fleet Safety ELDs appeared first on Truck Drivers USA.

OOIDA is now backing the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) ongoing initiative to identify and eliminate excessive and costly regulations. This effort aims to streamline processes and enhance safety without imposing unnecessary burdens on truck drivers.

DOT’s Deregulatory Process

The DOT opened a 30-day public comment period in April, inviting feedback on regulations that can be modified, repealed, or amended. Nearly 900 responses poured in, with truck drivers voicing their concerns and calling for more operational freedom to perform their jobs safely and efficiently.

“These ineffective rules have driven up costs for small-business truckers, pushing many safe and experienced operators out of the industry,” wrote OOIDA President Todd Spencer in the Association’s 17-page official response.

The submission outlined several changes aimed at reducing regulatory overreach. Topics included speed limiters, hours of service, English proficiency, and broker transparency.

Key Issues OOIDA Addressed

Speed Limiter Mandate Concerns

OOIDA strongly opposes a potential federal speed-limiter mandate for commercial vehicles. Although speed limiter proposals were introduced in 2016 and again in 2022, the regulation has yet to be finalized.

“Professional truck drivers strongly object to any speed limiter mandate,” OOIDA wrote. Association leaders argue that speed limiters increase stress, fatigue, and safety risks by creating dangerous speed differentials. They also highlight concerns about limiting drivers’ ability to maneuver safely in emergencies.

OOIDA believes states should retain authority over speed regulations, as Congress deliberately handed these responsibilities to states in 1995. The Association urges DOT to withdraw the rulemaking effort entirely.

Reforming Hours of Service Rules

OOIDA’s advocacy led to some flexibility improvements in hours-of-service (HOS) regulations in 2020, but the group continues to push for further changes to account for driver needs and safety.

“HOS rules are overly complex and fail to align with the physical capabilities of individual drivers,” OOIDA explained. The Association suggests allowing drivers to “pause” their clock and adopt expanded sleeper-berth options, such as 6/4 or 5/5 splits, to support rest and alertness better. Operators argue such flexibility would enable safer and more practical scheduling.

Ensuring English Proficiency for Drivers

OOIDA is calling for stricter enforcement of English proficiency requirements for commercial drivers. The Association says that understanding signage, communicating with law enforcement, and managing emergencies are critical for safety.

“The ability to understand and react to road signs is critical for public and operational safety,” OOIDA emphasized. The Association welcomed President Donald Trump’s executive order to resume enforcement of English proficiency regulations and urged more industry attention to this area.

Increasing Broker Transparency

Broker transparency has long been a concern in the trucking community. Current regulations require brokers to provide carrier transaction records, but enforcement is inconsistent.

OOIDA petitioned the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for stricter transparency measures, proposing a rule that obligates brokers to share transaction records electronically within 48 hours.

“If implemented properly, this rulemaking will contribute to a more ethical, fair, and efficient freight brokerage marketplace,” OOIDA wrote.

Other Recommendations for Reform

Beyond the highlighted issues, OOIDA made additional calls for action, including repealing the electronic logging device (ELD) mandate and phasing out the Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) system.

The ELD rule, which took effect in 2017, costs an estimated $1.8 billion annually. OOIDA contends it has shown no measurable impact on highway safety. Similarly, the Association criticized the UCR system as an unnecessary and wasteful expense.

Looking Ahead

While the official public comment period closed on May 5, the DOT continues to accept comments via email at Transportation.RegulatoryInfo@dot.gov under the subject line “Regulatory Reform RFI.”

OOIDA remains hopeful that this movement reflects a broader commitment by the DOT to actively engage with truck drivers and prioritize their expertise and feedback.

“Moving forward, DOT can best identify meaningful regulatory reforms by listening to America’s truckers, attending industry events, and holding public discussions on vital safety issues,” OOIDA wrote.

The DOT could significantly enhance safety, working conditions, and operational efficiency for the nation’s truckers by pursuing these recommended regulatory changes.

Source: Land Line

The post OOIDA Proposes DOT Regulatory Reforms to Improve Safety and Reduce Costs: Addressing Regulations in the Trucking Industry appeared first on Truck Drivers USA.

“Get rid of the FMCSA speed limiter mandate proposal,” wrote Edward Vazemiller in a public comment. “It is unsafe for semitrucks. OOIDA even had a video about it. Speed limiters on semitrucks will cause more road rage, shootings, traffic, bumper-to-bumper traffic, rear-end collisions, and more accidents overall. Plus, it will delay the supply chain of America.”

Public Opposition to Speed Limiters

On April 3, as part of a broader initiative to curb excessive regulation, the DOT launched a 30-day public comment period. Within two weeks, they had already received close to 500 comments. Many truckers voiced concerns about the rigid hours-of-service regulations, the electronic logging device (ELD) mandate, and, most prominently, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s (FMCSA) speed limiter proposal.

“Proposed speed limiters are a bad idea,” commented Jeffrey Hartman, a veteran commercial driver with 35 years of experience and a spotless record of 4 million crash-free miles. “I have avoided many accidents by being able to accelerate my way out of trouble. The companies employing speed regulators now are one of the major causes of accidents.”

The FMCSA Speed Limiter Proposal

After issuing a notice in 2022, the FMCSA considered mandating speed-limiting devices for commercial vehicles weighing over 26,001 pounds. While no specific maximum speed was suggested, some safety advocates pushed for a 60 mph cap.

The response was overwhelmingly negative, with the proposal drawing over 15,000 public comments. Drivers and organizations like the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) have highlighted a significant concern with the speed differentials this would create between trucks and passenger vehicles, potentially leading to more dangerous road conditions.

Many truckers see the speed limiter proposal as a prime candidate for repeal. A bill in Congress that aims to prevent FMCSA from implementing speed limiter mandates in the future adds weight to their calls.

“Another rule that has been proposed but not enacted is the speed limiter proposal,” wrote Dwayne Pope, a commenter. “If enacted, this will destroy many lives because car drivers have become so impatient and dangerous nowadays. They cut slower-moving vehicles off and perform very dangerous maneuvers to get around trucks. Accidents will increase, and then the FMCSA and DOT will blame trucks and implement more useless regulations.”

How to Voice Your Opinion

The DOT invites public comments regarding regulations that could be modified or repealed. To provide feedback, visit Regulations.gov and enter Docket No. DOT-OST-2025-0026-0001. The comment period is open until May 5, giving stakeholders ample time to express their concerns.

For additional input beyond the comment window, you can email the DOT at Transportation.RegulatoryInfo@dot.gov. Include “Regulatory Reform RFI” in the email’s subject line to ensure your suggestions are directed appropriately.

Source: Land Line

The post Truckers Push Back Against DOT’s Speed Limiter Proposal appeared first on Truck Drivers USA.

Concerns Over Hours-of-Service Rules

One of the most frequently mentioned topics was the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s (FMCSA) hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. Many drivers argued that the rules are too rigid and fail to account for operators’ individual needs and circumstances.

“If you are driving 11 hours a day and taking a 30-minute break within the first eight hours and working a total of 14 hours for the day, there is no need to have the 70-hour rule,” trucker Stacey Dain commented. “As a driver, I get plenty of rest following the other three rules, not being overworked.”

Several drivers echoed the sentiment that the regulations should allow flexibility, enabling them to rest when tired and drive when they feel safe. Strictly enforced rules can pressure drivers to operate during designated windows regardless of the conditions, leading to unnecessary stress or unsafe driving scenarios.

“Most drivers wanted a choice to take a (30-minute) break – not mandatory,” noted Donna Dawes in her comment.

The Impact of the ELD Mandate

The electronic logging device (ELD) mandate, implemented by congressional mandate, was also a significant focus of criticism. Many drivers believe it has worsened the lack of flexibility in the hours-of-service rules.

One of the commenters, Joe Potratz, voiced his concerns, saying, “We are not robots. Every driver is different, and every job is different. The ELD forces drivers to drive when they are tired and try to sleep when they are not tired. That clock is always ticking once it starts for the day, and drivers make bad decisions under the stress and pressure the ELD creates. It creates a dangerous environment on the road.”

Drivers overwhelmingly called for a more adaptable system that accommodates individual needs and reduces the pressure created by the ELD-related restrictions.

Regulatory Rollbacks Underway

The DOT’s invitation for feedback aligns with a broader push by the current administration to reduce regulations across industries. On April 3, the DOT issued a notice requesting public input on regulations that could be modified or eliminated without compromising safety.

“The Department of Transportation seeks comments and information to assist DOT in identifying existing regulations, guidance, paperwork requirements and other regulatory obligations that can be modified or repealed, consistent with law, to ensure that DOT administrative actions do not undermine the national interest and that DOT achieves meaningful burden reduction while continuing to meet statutory obligations and ensure the safety of the U.S. transportation system,” the agency’s notice explained.

How to Provide Feedback

Public comments on this matter are open through May 5. Submissions can be made by visiting Regulations.gov and entering Docket No. DOT-OST-2025-0026-0001.

Additionally, the DOT is accepting feedback via email at Transportation.RegulatoryInfo@dot.gov. Include “Regulatory Reform RFI” in the subject line to ensure your email is recognized.

Truck drivers and other stakeholders are encouraged to share their insights. This initiative aims to identify regulations that can be adjusted or repealed to reduce burdens while maintaining safety and efficiency.

Source: Land Line

The post Truckers Call for Reforms to Federal Regulations appeared first on Truck Drivers USA.